The Supreme Court is about to decide how far geofence warrants can go | CyberScoop<\/title> <meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Chatrie v. United States, a landmark case examining whether geofence warrants violate Fourth Amendment digital privacy rights.\"> <link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/supreme-court-geofence-warrants-chatrie-case\/\"> <meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\"> <meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\"> <meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Supreme Court is about to decide how far geofence warrants can go\"> <meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Chatrie v. United States, a landmark case examining whether geofence warrants violate Fourth Amendment digital privacy rights.\"> <meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/supreme-court-geofence-warrants-chatrie-case\/\"> <meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"CyberScoop\"> <meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/cyberscoop\/\"> <meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-22T16:08:26+00:00\"> <meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-04-22T16:08:29+00:00\"> <meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg\"> <meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\"> <meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1280\"> <meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\"> <meta name=\"author\" content=\"Tim Starks\"> <meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\"> <meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@timstarks\"> <meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@CyberScoopNews\">  <link rel=\"dns-prefetch\" href=\"\/\/securepubads.g.doubleclick.net\">\n<link rel=\"dns-prefetch\" href=\"\/\/use.typekit.net\">\n<link rel=\"alternate\" type=\"application\/rss+xml\" title=\"CyberScoop \u00bb Feed\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/feed\/\">\n<link rel=\"alternate\" type=\"application\/rss+xml\" title=\"CyberScoop \u00bb Comments Feed\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/comments\/feed\/\"> <link rel=\"stylesheet\" id=\"all-css-2\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-includes\/css\/dist\/block-library\/style.min.css?m=1774626878g\" type=\"text\/css\" media=\"all\"> <link rel=\"stylesheet\" id=\"all-css-6\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-content\/mu-plugins\/search\/elasticpress\/dist\/css\/related-posts-block-styles.min.css?m=1774625888g\" type=\"text\/css\" media=\"all\"> <link rel=\"stylesheet\" id=\"all-css-8\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-content\/themes\/scoopnewsgroup\/dist\/css\/frontend.css?m=1775068334g\" type=\"text\/css\" media=\"all\">\n<link rel=\"stylesheet\" id=\"typekit-css\" href=\"https:\/\/use.typekit.net\/itk2qbh.css?ver=13897d660a0ac2c9c7d1\" media=\"all\"> <link rel=\"https:\/\/api.w.org\/\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-json\/\"><link rel=\"alternate\" title=\"JSON\" type=\"application\/json\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88706\"><meta name=\"generator\" content=\"WordPress 6.8.5\">\n<link rel=\"shortlink\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/?p=88706\">\n<link rel=\"alternate\" title=\"oEmbed (JSON)\" type=\"application\/json+oembed\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-json\/oembed\/1.0\/embed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcyberscoop.com%2Fsupreme-court-geofence-warrants-chatrie-case%2F\">\n<link rel=\"alternate\" title=\"oEmbed (XML)\" type=\"text\/xml+oembed\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-json\/oembed\/1.0\/embed?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcyberscoop.com%2Fsupreme-court-geofence-warrants-chatrie-case%2F&format=xml\">   <link rel=\"icon\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/cropped-cs_favicon-2.png?w=32\" sizes=\"32x32\">\n<link rel=\"icon\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/cropped-cs_favicon-2.png?w=192\" sizes=\"192x192\">\n<link rel=\"apple-touch-icon\" href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/cropped-cs_favicon-2.png?w=180\">\n<meta name=\"msapplication-TileImage\" content=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/3\/2023\/01\/cropped-cs_favicon-2.png?w=270\"> <\/head><body class=\"wp-singular post-template-default single single-post postid-88706 single-format-standard wp-theme-scoopnewsgroup wp-child-theme-cyberscoop\" id=\"readabilityBody\"> <a href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/supreme-court-geofence-warrants-chatrie-case\/#main\" class=\"skip-to-content-link visually-hidden-focusable\">Skip to main content<\/a> <\/p>\n<div class=\"ad ad--top ad--top-desktop\">\n<div class=\"ad__inner\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Advertisement<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p> <main id=\"main\" role=\"main\" tabindex=\"-1\"> <\/p>\n<div class=\"ad ad--top ad--top-mobile\">\n<div class=\"ad__inner\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Advertisement<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"stickybar\" class=\"stickybar stickybar--newsletter js-stickybar\" readability=\"0.82\"> <button class=\"stickybar__close js-stickybar-close\" aria-controls=\"stickybar\"> <svg class=\"icon icon--close\" width=\"21\" height=\"22\" viewBox=\"0 0 21 22\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"m.822.518-.805.805L9.695 11 .017 20.678l.805.805 9.678-9.678 9.677 9.678.806-.805L11.305 11l9.678-9.677-.806-.805-9.677 9.677L.822.518Z\" fill=\"currentColor\" \/><\/svg> <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Close<\/span> <\/button> <\/section>\n<article class=\"single-article content\">\n<div class=\"single-article__container js-single-article-content\">\n<header class=\"single-article__header \" readability=\"25.712412587413\">\n<div class=\"single-article__header-content\" readability=\"34.627802690583\">\n<p> Chatrie v. United States asks whether a single warrant can justify a location-data dragnet \u2014 and what \u201cprobable cause\u201d means when the search starts with basically everyone nearby. <\/p>\n<p>  <br \/>\n<audio id=\"audio-player\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-tts-cdn.api.scpnewsgrp.com\/cyberscoop\/88706\/english.openai.mp3\"><\/audio> <\/p>\n<div readability=\"11\">\n<div>\n<p>Listen to this article<\/p>\n<p>  <\/p>\n<p>0:00<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>  <\/p>\n<p> <span id=\"tts-tooltip\">Learn more.<\/span> <span> This feature uses an automated voice, which may result in occasional errors in pronunciation, tone, or sentiment. <\/span> <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>  <\/div>\n<div class=\"single-article__cover-wrap\">\n<figure class=\"single-article__cover\"> <img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" fetchpriority=\"high\" width=\"640\" height=\"426\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go.jpg?resize=640%2C426&ssl=1\" class=\"single-article__cover-image wp-post-image\" alt decoding=\"async\" fetchpriority=\"high\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg 1920w, https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg?resize=300,200 300w, https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg?resize=768,512 768w, https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg?resize=1024,683 1024w, https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg?resize=1536,1024 1536w, https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg?resize=600,400 600w, https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg?resize=252,168 252w, https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg?resize=506,337 506w, https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg?resize=1013,675 1013w, https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-2.jpg?resize=1265,843 1265w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1013px) 100vw, 1013px\"><figcaption> Flowers adorn a garden in front of the U.S. Supreme Court building on March 31, 2026. (Photo by Roberto Schmidt\/Getty Images) <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"single-article__content\">\n<div class=\"single-article__content-inner has-drop-cap\"> <html readability=\"54.942635658915\"><body readability=\"112.57556628296\"><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Monday in a case that could limit the government\u2019s ability to obtain bulk digital data of device users with a single warrant, in a rare instance of the country\u2019s top justices taking on digital rights.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/search.aspx?filename=\/docket\/docketfiles\/html\/public\/25-112.html\">Chatrie v. The United States<\/a> is the first major Fourth Amendment case the court has taken up since 2018, despite the proliferation of technology that impacts privacy since then. At the center of what the justices will address are so-called geofence warrants, which compel companies to disclose user data from a certain time and location.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a really interesting question about a law enforcement tool that would have been unimaginable a few decades ago, where you can basically look at potentially every phone, for example, that passed through a particular area in a particular window,\u201d said John Villasenor, a law professor at UCLA and nonresident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.<\/p>\n<p>Both conservative and liberal civil liberties advocates have lined up in favor of the petitioner, leaving the United States government with fewer friend-of-the-court briefs on its side. Okello Chatrie was convicted for a 2019 bank robbery after police used a geofence warrant to obtain information from Google about users during a one-hour period and 17.5-acre area, then refined the search.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad ad--inline_1 \">\n<div class=\"ad__inner\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Advertisement<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>In Congress, Democrats have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.padilla.senate.gov\/newsroom\/press-releases\/padilla-calls-on-google-to-limit-collection-and-storage-of-location-data-as-republicans-seek-to-criminalize-abortion%EF%BF%BC\/\">raised concerns<\/a> about geofence warrants as they might pertain to abortion rights, while Republicans have <a href=\"https:\/\/judiciary.house.gov\/sites\/evo-subsites\/republicans-judiciary.house.gov\/files\/evo-media-document\/2023-08-10-jdj-to-doj-re-geofencing.pdf\">raised concerns<\/a> about their use in tracking suspects linked to the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection at the Capitol.<\/p>\n<p>Courts have been divided on the legality of the geofence warrant in Chatrie\u2019s case. Google has since <a href=\"https:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/google-maps-location-data-history-stored-locally-2023-12\">stopped storing location data in the cloud<\/a> and moved records directly to user devices, but those siding with Chatrie say it could have broader implications for financial records, search history records, chat bot records and more.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe think it\u2019s important that courts get it right and that, among other things, courts recognize that we have a property interest in many of our digital records,\u201d said Brent Skorup, a legal fellow at the Cato Institute, which has filed an amicus brief on behalf of the petitioner. \u201cIf the government can get those digital records without a warrant, that renders the Fourth Amendment pretty empty and we\u2019re not secure in our privacy and traditional rights to having control of our private papers and effects.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The United States noted that Chatrie opted into Google\u2019s storage of his location history, and that the information\u2019s collection is not substantially different from identification of other markers of someone\u2019s presence, like tire tracks or boot prints.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIndividuals generally have no reasonable expectation of privacy in information disclosed to a third party and then conveyed by the third party to the government,\u201d it wrote. A collection of 32 attorneys general have sided with the U.S. government, as well as some law professors.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad ad--inline_1 \">\n<div class=\"ad__inner\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Advertisement<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>In the 2018 case, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/17pdf\/16-402_h315.pdf\">Carpenter v. The United States<\/a>, the Supreme Court limited the applicability of that \u201cthird-party doctrine\u201d \u2014 echoed by the U.S. government\u2019s argument in the Chatrie case \u2014 to search and seizure of 127 days\u2019 worth of someone\u2019s cell site location information, ruling that it constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment and therefore required a warrant.<\/p>\n<p>The type of warrant is at issue in Chatrie v. The United States. A Virginia court ultimately found that geofence warrant unconstitutional because it was not sufficiently specific and was not supported by probable cause for every user whose data was collected. However, the court ruled the evidence was admissible in court, because law enforcement acted in \u201cgood faith\u201d in the belief that it was constitutional.<\/p>\n<p>Villasenor said the court could clear a lot up by addressing the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/articles\/supreme-court-agrees-to-hear-a-fourth-amendment-case-regarding-geofence-warrants\/\">good faith exception<\/a>, something lower courts have used to sidestep substantial constitutional rulings, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.law.georgetown.edu\/georgetown-law-journal\/in-print\/volume-113\/volume-113-issue-3-february-2025\/the-reality-of-the-good-faith-exception\/\">one study<\/a>. But both Villasenor and Skorup say it\u2019s possible that the Supreme Court also could fail to arrive at a conclusive ruling on the issues at stake in Chatrie.<\/p>\n<p>While some civil liberties advocates are optimistic about the outcome due to the court\u2019s ruling in Carpenter, three justices in that case have since been replaced by others.<\/p>\n<p>The rarity of such digital privacy cases rising to the level of the Supreme Court might be simply a function of a crowded court agenda, but it\u2019s not the only possibility.<\/p>\n<div class=\"ad ad--inline_1 \">\n<div class=\"ad__inner\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Advertisement<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>\u201cPart of it might be because the court has not developed a consensus view about how to approach these yet,\u201d Skorup said. \u201cIt\u2019s speculation on my part, but they probably have some ambivalence about taking up cases where they know that they\u2019re not going to speak with one voice, or they know they might speak with fractured voices.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Google itself filed a brief in the case, but sided with neither party, saying it took no position on the warrant in Chatrie\u2019s specific case.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut it urges the Court to hold that Google Location History and other similar digital documents stored remotely deserve the Fourth Amendment\u2019s protection,\u201d it wrote. \u201cA contrary rule would leave the intimate details of millions of Americans\u2019 daily lives \u2014 data that will exist in many forms as technology rapidly develops \u2014 exposed to warrantless surveillance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p> <\/body> <\/p>\n<footer class=\"single-article__footer\">\n<div class=\"author-card\" readability=\"7.7216117216117\">\n<div class=\"author-card__avatar\">\n<figure class=\"author-card__image-wrap\"> <img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"author-card__image\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/ddi.mohflo.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go-1.jpg?w=640&ssl=1\" alt=\"Tim Starks\"> <\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"author-card__details\" readability=\"10.901098901099\">\n<h4 class=\"author-card__name\">Written by Tim Starks<\/h4>\n<p> Tim Starks is senior reporter at CyberScoop. His previous stops include working at The Washington Post, POLITICO and Congressional Quarterly. An Evansville, Ind. native, he’s covered cybersecurity since 2003. Email Tim here: <a href=\"mailto:tim.starks@cyberscoop.com\">tim.starks@cyberscoop.com<\/a>. <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"single-article__tags-container\">\n<h4 class=\"single-article__tags-title\">In This Story<\/h4>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/footer>\n<p> <\/html><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"single-article__ads js-single-article-sidebar\">\n<div class=\"ad ad--sidebar js-single-article-sidebar-5 ad--rightrail_1 \">\n<div class=\"ad__inner\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Advertisement<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ad ad--sidebar js-single-article-sidebar-4 ad--rightrail_2 \">\n<div class=\"ad__inner\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Advertisement<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"ad ad--sidebar js-single-article-sidebar-3 ad--rightrail_3 \">\n<div class=\"ad__inner\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Advertisement<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/article>\n<div class=\"popular-stories popular-stories--single-post\">\n<div class=\"popular-stories__container\">\n<h2 class=\"popular-stories__title\"> More Scoops <\/h2>\n<p>  <\/div>\n<p>\n<\/div>\n<p> <\/p>\n<section class=\"latest-podcasts\">\n<h2 class=\"latest-podcasts__title\"> Latest Podcasts\t<\/h2>\n<\/section>\n<div class=\"top-categories\">\n<div class=\"top-categories__container\">\n<h3 class=\"top-categories__category-title\">Government<\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"top-categories__container\">\n<h3 class=\"top-categories__category-title\">Technology<\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> <\/main> <\/p>\n<div class=\"ad ad--bottom \">\n<div class=\"ad__inner\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Advertisement<\/span> <\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"interstitial\" class=\"welcome__container\"> <button id=\"close-modal-1\" class=\"welcome__clickable_area\"><\/button> <\/p>\n<div class=\"welcome__ad_wrapper\">\n<p> <button id=\"close-modal-3\" class=\"welcome__continue-button\">Continue to CyberScoop<\/button> <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>   <\/body> <a href=\"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/supreme-court-geofence-warrants-chatrie-case\/\">Source<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court is about to decide how far geofence<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6475,6476,6477,6478,387,117,268,1704,2345,3510],"tags":[6479,6480,6481,6482,391,119,274,1708,2348,3515],"class_list":["post-8570","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brookings-institution","category-cato-institute","category-fourth-amendment","category-geofence-warrant","category-google","category-government","category-privacy","category-supreme-court","category-u-s-courts","category-u-s-supreme-court","tag-brookings-institution","tag-cato-institute","tag-fourth-amendment","tag-geofence-warrant","tag-google","tag-government","tag-privacy","tag-supreme-court","tag-u-s-courts","tag-u-s-supreme-court"],"featured_image_urls":{"full":"","thumbnail":"","medium":"","medium_large":"","large":"","1536x1536":"","2048x2048":"","chromenews-featured":"","chromenews-large":"","chromenews-medium":""},"author_info":{"display_name":"Cyber Scoop","author_link":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/author\/cyberscoop\/"},"category_info":"<a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/brookings-institution\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Brookings Institution<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/cato-institute\/\" rel=\"category tag\">CATO Institute<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/fourth-amendment\/\" rel=\"category tag\">fourth amendment<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/geofence-warrant\/\" rel=\"category tag\">geofence warrant<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/google\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Google<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/government\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Government<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/privacy\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Privacy<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/supreme-court\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Supreme Court<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/u-s-courts\/\" rel=\"category tag\">U.S. courts<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/category\/u-s-supreme-court\/\" rel=\"category tag\">U.S. Supreme Court<\/a>","tag_info":"U.S. Supreme Court","comment_count":"0","jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8570","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8570"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8570\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8570"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8570"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8570"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

{"id":8570,"date":"2026-04-22T11:08:26","date_gmt":"2026-04-22T16:08:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cyberscoop.com\/?p=88706"},"modified":"2026-04-22T11:08:26","modified_gmt":"2026-04-22T16:08:26","slug":"the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ddi.mohflo.net\/index.php\/2026\/04\/22\/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-decide-how-far-geofence-warrants-can-go\/","title":{"rendered":"The Supreme Court is about to decide how far geofence warrants can go"},"content":{"rendered":"